Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX offers a weight of 195g / 6,88oz, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX
