Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX offers a weight of 195g / 6,88oz, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin YUPIE
