Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX edges out Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 143g / 5,04oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX
