Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
