Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

90.10 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €655.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.