Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

90.10 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19

Spinning

3000x

86.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €129.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX and Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, while Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X stands out for a durability of 8.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.