Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). While Delphin SHARX 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
