Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

90.10 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Sargus II Spinning

Spinning

2500x

64.80 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.05 out of 10

Gear ratio5.5:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight284g / 10.02oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.20
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) and total score (9.01 out of 10). While Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.