Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
