Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX and Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
