Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
