Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX and Shimano Tyrnos 30 II perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 30 II stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Tyrnos 30 II?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
