Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X
