Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
