Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT, 3000D-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10610-300
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €185.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD, left and right hand, Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10923-025
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €209.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a weight of 205g / 7,23oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables