Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Delphin FRIZ


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
