Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €655.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.