Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa Crossfire LT

Spinning

45.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.68 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €30.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa Crossfire LT?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency