Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX edges out Daiwa TANACOM 1200X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the weight (205g / 7,23oz). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.72 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
