Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
