Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
