Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin SHARX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
