Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
