Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Penn 2020 Clash II

Spinning

75.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.61 out of 10

Ergonomics6.22 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight235g / 8.29oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.20
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X stands out for a durability of 8.61 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.