Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €65.70
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX edges out Penn FIERCE IV 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the total score (8.27 out of 10). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.