Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €677.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 205g / 7,23oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano 20 Stella?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC
