Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
93.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight410g / 14.46oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €733.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/200
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 205g / 7,23oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano 20 Stella?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
