Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
