Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
