Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
