Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Vanford FA

Spinning

70.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €195.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000SDHA
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX edges out Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the total score (8.27 out of 10). Still, Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 185g / 6,53oz and a ergonomics of 6.38 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.