Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X
