Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (8.27 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Cardiff 401A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
