Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
