Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
