Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
