Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
