Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX
