Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
45.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
