Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
