Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin SHARX 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
