Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Delphin FRIZ
