Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
