Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

84.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €195.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn 2020 Clash II

Spinning

75.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.61 out of 10

Ergonomics6.22 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight235g / 8.29oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.20
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X stands out for a durability of 8.61 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.