Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
