Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

84.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €195.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano 20 Stella

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight415g / 14.64oz

Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €677.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Conclusion

Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 230g / 8,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano 20 Stella?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency