Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
