Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX and Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
