Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5115oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24016 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
