Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5115oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24016 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.87 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
