Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5115oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24016 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 145g / 5115oz and a ergonomics of 6.52 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
