Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5115oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24016 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 145g / 5115oz and a ergonomics of 6.52 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Presso LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
